|
Posted by albertpisces on 2008-05-15 10:00 下午
|
|
业务情景是在一个仓库中有多个仓管人员每天在系统中将物料转移到其他仓库或非仓库库存地点。这样如果多个用户同时LT06创建TO时，921存储类型会被其他用户锁定住，但由于每天要转移的物料较多，需要多个人员同时操作，请问有没有办法能让多个用户同时在一个仓库中同时创建TO而又
不让系统锁定921存储类型？
|
|
|
|
Posted by baiboyd on 2008-05-16 12:12 下午
|
|
你可以用SM30运行表V_T3000修改一下冻结逻辑试试，具体用哪个值我就不说了，你可以测试看。
|
|
|
|
Posted by shua_14000 on 2008-05-19 11:57 下午
|
|
那里只能配置收货不冻结,而且只针对Open area存储类型.
|
|
|
|
Posted by RogerTian on 2008-05-20 02:21 下午
|
|
谁说那个“只针对Open area存储类型”？你不妨把Block Method改成B测试一下。
|
|
|
|
Posted by albertpisces on 2008-05-21 09:21 上午
|
|
Block Method确是只针对Open area存储类型，另几种Block Method不是控制同一仓位的锁定。
|
|
|
|
Posted by RogerTian on 2008-05-21 10:48 上午
|
楼上，哪里的依据说这个只针对Open Area存储类型？
先看看这个字段的Help：
Blocking logic in Warehouse Management
There are 3 settings for this data field that determine to what degree multiple users are allowed to remove materials from storage bins in the warehouse:
With switch setting " " (blank), when you create a transfer order, the material numbers that are being processed are blocked in the entire warehouse. In addition, all storage bins in the transfer order are temporarily blocked. When you confirm a transfer order, only the storage bins for differences are blocked.
With switch setting "A" several users can work with the same material at the same time. It is not possible, however, for multiple users to access the same bin simultaneously.
With switch setting "B" several users can work in the same bin at the same time. The synchronization with regards to bin stock is then carried out based only on "data carrying blocks", for example, a specific material is only blocked within the storage bin in the quantity that is currently being processed.
Parallel stock placements of a material into the same storage bin can only be carried out using strategy "C" and " " when the capacity check is switched off (at the storage type level).
Important: You can only change the switch for blocking logic when no users are processing transfer orders - that is, when no one is creating or confirming transfer orders.
|
|
|
|
Posted by albertpisces on 2008-05-21 11:18 上午
|
Parallel stock placements of a material into the same storage bin can only be carried out using strategy "C" and " " when the capacity check is switched off (at the storage type level).
Strategy C is Open area.
版主不要生气嘛，如果我说错了向大家表示歉意。来这里也是想交流问题。我之前也多次打扰版主和其他高手了，确实应该谢谢大家。
|
|
|
|
Posted by RogerTian on 2008-05-26 09:57 上午
|
albertpisces, 这里欢迎讨论问题。你的问题是“有没有办法能让多个用户同时在一个仓库中同时创建TO而又不让系统锁定921存储类型”，你问的是“存储类型”。存储类型是不会被另一个用户的TO锁定的。
至于说仓位，“With switch setting "B" several users can work in the same bin at the same time. ”，从字面意思理解是可以实现你的目的的。所以请你先测试一下结果，测试后确实不行那就是SAP的确是对这一功能做了限制。如果确实SAP不允许，这从原理上来也可以理解的，假如某个仓位启用Capacity Management并且该仓位只剩余能力X，那么系统允许多个用户同时对该仓位各入库X的逻辑也显然也是不合理的。
退一步说，多个用户同时对某一仓位同时创建TO的实际情形应该也不是很多的，这可以通过入库策略搜索或者自动创建TO等方式来有效避免。即使不可避免要用LT06创建TO，这个锁住仓位的时间也不应该是可以接受的很短时间。albertpisces不妨把你所说的实际业务情景描述清楚一点，例如你的入库策略，为什么用LT06而不用立即TO或者自动TO，用LT06创建TO的时候用户需要手工干预什么，平均LT06操作时间是多少。
|
|
|
|
Posted by baiboyd on 2008-05-26 12:51 下午
|
我是这样理解楼主的意思，他们每天做很多311、411 storage location间的转储，而对应的WM移动类型311（转储出库）、312（转储入库）都使用了临时存储区921的同一个仓位（如IDES仓库号001用了UML-ZONE），然后他们的业务可能要求对TO进行确认，而从IM物料移动作业到仓库实物移动后并作TO之间需要一段不短的时间，由于存在仓位UML-ZONE上存在未清TO，从而导致了它的锁定。
RogerTian说的对，“存储类型是不会被另一个用户的TO锁定的”，但仓位却有被锁定的可能。而对于SAP提供的WM锁定机制Block Method来说，没有考虑对存储类型的锁定，当然也是没多大必要（不会考虑你的特定的临时存储类型）。
本人建议：WM移动类型311（转储出库）、312（转储入库）使用动态仓位坐标。
|
|